Autumn in the North Cemetery.

Sixty miles west of Boston, Massachusetts there is the small New England town of Sturbridge. Located at the junction of I-90 (The Mass Pike), and I-84 it has become known as the "Crossroads of New England". The town was first settled over 300 years ago, and like other small New England towns it has grown just enough over the years to be in a difficult place today. How do we embrace the future without forgetting how we got to our present? How do we attract the right kind of growth, and maintain who we are? And, what about our culture out here in Central Massachusetts?

These pages will cause one to think about how to protect what we have, our future direction, and how to move on in the very best way.

Those thoughts, and other ramblings, will hopefully inspire more thought, conversation, action, and occasionally a smile...

...seems to be working so far

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

I Walk The Line

When I came out this way back in 2000 I fell in love with the area immediately. Not only the landscape, and the people, but the fact there was TWO supermarkets in town, TWO Dunkin' Donuts, a JC Penny, Linens & Things, a Wal*Mart, Old Navy, Pier One, a shoe store, Marshalls, and a Sherwin Williams Paint Store.

Whoa, baby.

For a small town of under 10,000 people this community had so much going for it. I didn't have to jump in the car and drive 10 miles out of town to shop for a tie and dress shirt. I had a choice of food stores. I could grab a cup of coffee no matter what part of town I was in, and still the town had that rural quality that I grew up with, and had been missing for so many years.

Around the time I first settled in, a friend of mine told me about the hard times Sturbridge had a few years earlier. She had been a member of the Planning Board, and said her time on that board during the late 90's was one of the hardest, most exhausting times she could remember.

It seems there was this group in town that were very much against Wal*Mart coming to town. The character of the town would change, and many of them were against the way Wal*Mart operated. Understandable. I don't like many of the things that Wal*Mart has done, and been accused of doing over the years either. I do like convenience, though. And, in the court of public opinion, when accused, Wal*Mart does scurry to make good, and at times they succeed.

This anti-Wal*Mart group was dubbed "SOS'ers for Save Our Sturbridge. Most were described to me as folks that would never shop at a Wal*Mart anyway, and felt that a large shopping plaza would ruin the small town appeal of Sturbridge. They were eventually labeled preservationists, tree huggers, crunchy-granola types. A large rift developed in town. Then it went away. Wal*Mart was built as were other stores and restaurants in the plaza. Many of those that opposed the building of the store can be seen shopping there now.

The wounds had healed.

Or, so we thought.

Over the past few months there has been a lot of name calling in this town. As the moderator at the Town Meeting stated, folks are passionate in their positions here in town. He also warned that he would not take any nonsense at the meeting, and if there was any, he had the power to have those that got out of line ejected, or even arrested. Sad state of affairs when a warning like that must be given at the beginning of a Town Meeting.

He didn't mince words. The Town Moderator was then placed on my Top Ten List.

Now, I am by no means what they refer to as a "SOS'er. Quite frankly, I wouldn't know one if I fell on them, but I'll hug a tree more often than not, stop my car on Route 2o to let a turtle cross, and I more than enjoy the walks Mary and I take on the trails in town. I've written a great deal about how much I enjoy the way of life out here in Central Massachusetts, and since I work in Boston, I can see, and feel the difference better than most. That being said, I am also not against growth if done in a planned, well thought out manner, and we don't destroy what we have.

If Bob Kraft didn't scoop the Bass Pro Shop folks for his Patriot Place in Foxboro, I'd be all for them coming here to Sturbridge. Maybe a huge L.L. Bean, or Kittery Trading Post Annex would do well here in town. And, why not? If planned right, placed right, and marketed right, a large business could fit in very well, and we could still maintain our way of life.

What I do have a hard time with is sprawl. Residential sprawl to be exact. Large housing developments of similar styled homes with no character, no trees, and little to offer other than bedrooms. That style was from the 1960's. We are far beyond that today

For 25 years I lived in another town in Massachusetts. When my house was built in 1975 the town still had much of its agricultural roots still in place. There were miles of meadows, and forests. There were some developments built during the late 1950's and some more in the 1960's, but not many house were erected. The 1970's saw a bump in the number of homes built. Mine was one of them. There was a wonderful farm out behind my place. I often said that when that place went to a developer it would be time to leave. It was purchased by a large New Jersey builder in the 1980's and soon the meadows were gone, the pastures and horses gone, the woods gone, and the old farm house and barns, all gone.

The 1980's added hundreds and hundreds of homes to the town. For several years the town had the most building permits issued for any town in the entire state, close to 500 per year.

The town changed quickly. Builders were given special treatment. Closed door deals were made, and the town lost it who it was. It became what Framingham was in the 1960's. Over built with no end in sight.

Based on what I've seen happen elsewhere, I don't want to ever see it happen here in Sturbridge. We have so many bright, sharp individuals here in town that are able to walk the line, and make good decisions. They may be pro or con on a particular subject, but they stand behind their opinion, and don't resort to sophomoric behavior. And, above all, they will listen to an opposing view, and take it under advisement. We are very fortunate in this regard.

So, where would I stand in this morass of acronyms? Am I really an SOS'er? I don't know. First, I'd have to actually meet one to be sure, and learn the secret handshake and all, but this I will share with you, I like trees. I can't wait to hear the peepers in the spring, I enjoy sitting by a pond and watching the turtles sunbathe, and I will support any cause that is designed to save those moments for our children.

On the other hand, I am for growing our town to meet the needs of its residents, too. I can walk a tightrope very well. Thoughtful, planned out growth by both sides is key. No other way to do it.

In the meantime, I'll support the best ideas and plans of those residents, no matter what acronym they fall under.

See, it's not all about me, it's all about us.

Now, if you'll excuse me, there is a Maple in the yard that needs a squeeze.

1 comment:

  1. Happy Nurses Day, Thinking Out Loud!

    A hardy secret handshake to you, and pat on the back too: Welcome to the SOS'er club, Thinking!

    Oy – I read all ten paragraphs of Tom Creamer’s rantings at SPW. Can somebody please give this guy his sleep meds?

    He stated there are "shots" you have taken at him. I cannot believe he wrote an open letter such as that, then pasted to his blog for the world to see, and thinks it’s not an embarrassment to himself and those he claims to represent?

    Moreover, he says he "owes it to himself to stand up and challenge you." That letter sounds like a whining crybaby wrote it.

    Please, this is a guy who has focused his obsessive attention on certain residents. He defames and libels them with allegations of drug addiction, alcoholism, dishonesty, deceit, deception, mental illness and insanity.

    The allegations are false, they discredit the subject’s of record, they are published with actual malice, and in his case as a public official - it is glaringly malicious - and it’s damaging in many ways to those he has classified and categorized as such.

    Yet, Thinking, it is you who impugns his character? No, Mr. Creamer is the impugner.

    This is a guy who has temper tantrums on camera during his Planning Board meetings, which by the way...have you looked at the upcoming agenda for tonight's meeting? The agenda is 50 minutes long - there is NOTHING on it that allows or prompts discussion for planning growth in Sturbridge.

    Didn't someone mention Smart Growth in Sturbridge on this blog not long ago? Where is that discussion promised from a member of the Planning Board in a previous post on Thinking Out Loud? With so little to talk about, does the Planner really need an assistant? Time to trim the fat, no?

    Creamer is a guy, who, during his tenure as Chair of the Planning Board has accomplished nothing worthy of note. Speaking of which, where has he been the last few meetings? He’s able to maintain his blog, run his dogs, tailgate women in their cars, report federal violations, and do a host of other things, but he can’t fulfill his obligations as the Planning Board Chair? Time for him to go!

    Mr. Thinking, I must ask: has he ever submitted comments to your blog using different aliases? Because he emphatically denies this practice.


Anonymous comments not accepted, and will be rejected. Please use your full name. Choose "Name / URL" and enter your name, and your name ONLY. Leave "URL" blank.